For several years in Britain now, a high-speed line between London and Birmingham (initially) and beyond has been under discussion. I was reading an article about the effects of high-speed rail in France, discussing a study that claims high-speed rail only benefits the managerial classes. As a successful businesswoman, I am very aware that there are lies, damned lies and statistics. There are several factors about France's high-speed rail system that they have ignored.
On the other hand, France concentrates on the fundamentals: - high capacity, good-value offerings and great journey times. A Frenchwoman doesn't like garish interior decoration, so the relatively simple furnishings even in first class have been highly appreciated. The TGV Euroduplex sets have 560 seats and the TGV Océane sets have 556 seats. Also, there are the Ouigo services operated directly by SNCF and the Izy services operated by Thalys which SNCF part-owns. Ouigo keeps costs down by serving underused stations, whereas the Izy services do this by travelling on slower and cheaper conventional routes: - both have Ryanair-style baggage policies. Given how impossibly dainty we are, we Frenchwomen have little need for the super-sized Premium seats that OEBB/ÖBB (the Austrian state operator) uses on RailJet services, but they are still cool!
That is not to say that the TGV system doesn't appeal to successful businesswomen such as myself: - we appreciate being able to get lots of work done on the train using our tablet-laptop hybrids whilst we zip between important meetings (as well as fashion shows, in my case). As France typically has a 35-hour week, the quid pro quo is that high productivity rates are necessary if we want a high standard of living. We Frenchwomen accomplish this effortlessly. When I lived and worked in London, was still frowned upon for leaving on time, even though my colleagues wasted lots of time in useless tasks and got half as much work done as me!
HS2 has been criticised as being just a luxury line, but this fails to take account of what the line is intended to do. It is intended to be a relief line for the congested West Coast Main Line: - the commuter trains are already very packed and the freight capacity is squeezed. There are passenger trains (e.g. the cramped Pendolino services operated by Virgin) which go a long way north before stopping anywhere: - some London Euston services don't stop until Warrington Bank Quay (near Liverpool). Such services have no need whatsoever to be on the conventional West Coast Main Line south of Crewe (opening 2027, a year later than the first stage to Birmingham), so HS2 would be useful for such services.
According to an article Railway Gazette recently published about the findings of the "Conseil d’Orientation des Infrastructures" and its recommendations for future direction in railway construction, some lines should be prioritised: - http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/capacity-enhancement-at-hubs-is-spending-priority-says-infrastructure-council.html . I am delighted that they recommended prioritising the Marseille-Nice line: - I love going to places like Nice, St. Tropez and Monaco because of how ritzy-glitzy they are! On the other hand, it is a shame they aren't specifically recommending taking forward the LGV Montpellier-Perpignan: - I often have have business in Spain and Bilal loves to visit his homies in Seville and we would love to be able to do this all the way.
Anyway, we shall see what happens with these schemes in the UK and France!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello and welcome to my blog Impossibly Dainty French Woman where I tell everyone how wonderful we Frenchwomen are and how to be impossibly perfect and thin like us. Feel free to comment here or e-mail me on mariannegaboriault@gmail.com .